Tata Trust Row: Mehli Mistry Questions Eligibility of Venu Srinivasan, Vijay Singh

Tata Trusts: Mehli Mistry, a former trustee of the Tata Group's Bai Hirabai Trust, has challenged the appointment of Venu Srinivasan and Vijay Singh, calling them illegal. Read on to learn the full story of this dispute, which relates to the terms of the trust deed and Ratan Tata's legacy.

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 10:06 PM (IST)
 0
Tata Trust Row: Mehli Mistry Questions Eligibility of Venu Srinivasan, Vijay Singh
Tata Trust Row: Mehli Mistry Questions Eligibility of Venu Srinivasan, Vijay Singh

There is a huge controversy surrounding the administration of trusts associated with the Tata group. One-time trustees of three major Tata trusts, Mehli Mistry, have filed a petition against the appointments and duties of trustees Venu Srinivasan and Vijay Singh for the Bai Hirabai Jamsetji Tata Navsari Charitable Institution on Friday. According to him, both men are ineligible for the positions they hold, and their appointment violates the provisions of the trust deed made in 1923.

Currently, Venu Srinivasan, who is the Emeritus Chairman of TVS Motors, and Vijay Singh, an ex-IAS officer, serve as the vice chairmen of the trust. Mehli Mistry argues that, according to clauses 6 and 18 of the deed, any disqualified trustee should be deemed dead. Mistry's main claim is that Srinivasan and Singh are not followers of the Parsi Zoroastrian religion and do not have a permanent residence in Mumbai. According to the trust deed, both of these qualifications are mandatory to become trustees, and failing to do so would automatically disqualify them.

Mistry has requested the Maharashtra Charity Commissioner to take suo motu cognizance of the matter and initiate a detailed investigation. He has also requested that all trustees be directed to submit affidavits confirming their religious and residential eligibility. Mistry alleges that the appointment of these ineligible individuals constitutes fraud and criminal breach of trust, which amounts to mismanagement under the Indian Penal Code (BNS) 2024 and the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. He contends that any action taken by them as trustees is legally void.

Advertisement

Want to get your story featured as above? click here!

Advertisement

Want to get your story featured as above? click here!

Mistry has clarified in his application that the purpose of this complaint is not to seek his reinstatement or reinstatement in the trust. Other key points in the case are as follows:

  • Transparency and Protecting the Legacy: According to Mistry, his sole objective is to expose the alleged illegal practices of the trust and to preserve the values ​​of Ratan Tata and the founders for the welfare of the Parsi community.
  • Background to the Peaceful Exit: Previously, in October 2024, the Tata Trusts board passed a resolution to reappoint Mistry as a life trustee, but the appointment was not approved due to opposition from three trustees. Instead of escalating the controversy, Mistry, expressing his commitment to the late Ratan Tata, took an honorable leave from the Trust on November 4, 2025.
  • Previous objections: In February 2026, while still serving on the Tata Education and Development Trust (TEDT), Mistry objected to a proposal to abolish the position of "Vice-Chairman" in the Trusts, stating that the Trust Deed did not provide for such a position.

The Bai Hirabai Trust (BHJTNCI), established in 1923, works for the welfare of the Parsi community in Navsari, Gujarat, through education and healthcare. Currently, the Trust has six trustees, including Chairman Noel N. Tata and the two vice-chairmen mentioned in the complaint. Corporate and legal analysts are now closely watching the Maharashtra Charity Commissioner's decision. If an investigation is ordered, major administrative changes and stricter compliance rules are likely to be implemented at the top level of the Tata Trusts.

Muskan Kumawat Journalist & Writer