The study’s modelled scenarios indicate that tracker-based systems may achieve up to 23% higher specific yield under certain site conditions while potentially reducing overall EPC costs by as much as 10%, subject to project design, location and modelling assumptions. The analysis highlights the importance of site-specific evaluation when assessing mounting system selection for utility-scale solar projects in India.

The assessment evaluates energy yield and Levelized Cost of Energy (LCoE) across Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh, selected to represent diverse irradiation profiles, terrain conditions, and climatic environments. Using high-resolution SolarGIS resource data and detailed PVSyst simulations, the study analysed system performance under both CUF-matched and constant-DC scenarios to ensure a robust and like-for-like comparison.

The findings highlight the modelled performance differences of HSAT systems. Under the Study’s simulated scenarios, trackers require approximately 14-18% lower installed DC capacity to achieve the Capacity Utilization Factor (CUF) levels comparable to fixed-tilt systems, indicating reductions in infrastructure intensity. Even at equivalent DC capacities, HSAT configurations demonstrated a 3–4 percentage point improvement in CUF within the evaluated case. Across all three evaluated states, tracker systems showed higher simulated specific yield outcomes compared to fixed-tilt setups, with 15–23% higher specific yield and 12–16% higher transposition gains, driven by continuous sun tracking and enhanced irradiance capture throughout the day.

Speaking on the findings of the report, Jawwad Shaikh, Manager at SgurrEnergy, said, “This assessment showed that system-level optimisation can materially change the economics of solar projects. Based on our findings and under the evaluated scenarios, single-axis trackers demonstrated the ability to achieve the comparable CUF with lower DC capacity assumptions while delivering materially higher energy yield when compared to fixed -tilt systems. The implications are not just better performance but goes beyond to overall infrastructure intensity and lifecycle cost structures. For developers and asset owners operating in competitive markets, such design considerations can play a critical role in investment decisions.”

Rajeev Kashyap, Senior Vice President and General Manager, Nextpower India Private Limited added, “In a market where tariff competitiveness and performance certainty define project success, mounting system selection has become a strategic decision rather than a purely technical one. This independent assessment provides valuable analytical insight into how optimised tracker configurations can materially enhance energy productivity while reducing overall project cost intensity. The ability to achieve target CUFs with lower DC sizing, improved generation profiles, and stronger lifecycle economics reinforces the long-term value proposition of HSAT systems. Such data-driven analysis contributes to more informed decision-making for developers, investors, and lenders evaluating next-generation solar assets in India.”

The study confirms that optimized tracker configurations can be implemented without increasing project capital costs.When designed to meet defined CUF targets within the modelling framework, HSAT systems may reduce overall EPC CAPEX by approximately 7–10% across the evaluated geographies. This reduction is primarily driven by lower module procurement volumes, reduced DC-side balance-of-system requirements and decreased civil and structural quantities resulting from optimised DC sizing. As a result, HSAT systems consistently may achieve lower Levelized Cost of Energy across all assessed geographies. Across the analysed cases, the analysis showed that the combination of reduced capital intensity and higher annual energy yield produces a durable LCoE advantage, reinforcing trackers as a capital-efficient and execution-friendly solution in tariff-sensitive procurement environments.

As India accelerates renewable capacity addition and project developers seek sharper tariff competitiveness, the study underscores the growing importance of system-level optimisation in driving both technical performance and financial resilience in utility-scale solar projects.